Recent comments
Comments found: 9942
How does scripture speak to the world?
Andrew → paulf: Paul, I’ve only got time for
paulf → Andrew: Andrew, you speak of
The prophetic relationship of the people of God to the “land”
ScottL → Andrew: Yes, it would be great to
Andrew → ScottL: Now that would have been a
ScottL → Andrew: You said:
What now is the
Andrew → ScottL: The discussion is on page 91.
ScottL → Andrew: I had written a while back on
Scripture as the (historical) theological interpretation of history
ScottL → Andrew: Andrew -
Thanks for your
Andrew → ScottL: Scott, I’m not sure I follow
ScottL → Andrew: Andrew -
Would you say that
The community of the Beatitudes and the restoration of creation
Andrew → Brian MacArevey: No bother. I’ve tried to
Brian MacArevey → Brian MacArevey: Hey Andrew,
I’m sorry I keep
Brian MacArevey → Andrew: Thank you Andrew…I’ll keep
Andrew → Brian MacArevey: I had a look at the ‘now but
Douglas Campbell and the wrath of God
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I used the phrase Jesus’s
Andrew → peter wilkinson: My problem is not with the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Andrew - Do you think the
New Perspective and Reformed theologies at a crossroads
Jim Hoag → Geoff Holsclaw: Andrew,
DIAGRAMS!! What a
Geoff Holsclaw → Andrew: andrew,
thanks for the
Andrew → Geoff Holsclaw: Geoff, you’re absolutely
Geoff Holsclaw → Andrew: Andrew,
Thanks for this
Is evangelicalism worth fighting for?
Andrew → Jim Hoag: I suppose it’s conceivable
Jim Hoag → Andrew: Hi Andrew,
On Trevin Wax’s
Postconservative evangelicalism and beyond
Andrew → Jim Hoag: Good questions, Jim. Answered
Jim Hoag → Andrew: Andrew,
This was a really
Resurrection, rapture and relevance
Andrew → Daniel Levy: Thanks. I appreciate the
Daniel Levy → Andrew: Andrew,
I, for the most part
Andrew → Daniel James Levy: I’m not sure what to make of
Scot McKnight on Peter Leithart’s defence of Constantine
peter wilkinson → paulf: You don’t have to accept Paul
paulf → peter wilkinson: Thanks for the intelligent
Recent comments