Brant Pitre on the epiphany miracles: the stilling of the storm

Chapter two of Jesus and Divine Christology is about the “epiphany miracles.” Brant Pitre states the main purpose of the chapter quite bluntly: it is to “demolish the modern scholarly myth… that Jesus is not depicted as divine in the Synoptic Gospels” (40).

There are three such miracles: the stilling of the storm, the walking on the sea, and the transfiguration. It is Pitre’s view that

when each of these episodes is interpreted in a first-century Jewish context, a strong case can be made that in all three, Jesus is acting and speaking as if he is not just any kind of deity or heavenly being, but in some sense equal with the one God of Israel. (45)

Read more...
How did Jesus’ disciples imagine that he would “redeem Israel”?
Shortly after the death of Jesus, two from the band of his disciples are met by the risen Christ on the road to Emmaus (Lk. 24:13-35). He asks them what they are talking about, and, a little surprised by the ignorance of the fellow, they update him on what has just transpired in Jerusalem. It would… ( | 18 comments)
Why the outpouring of the Spirit on the day of Pentecost marked an end, not a beginning
One of the reasons why we routinely miss the point of Peter’s explanation of what happened on the day of Pentecost is, I think, that the canonical arrangement of books encourages us to read Acts as the beginning of something new rather than as a direct continuation of what went before. The New… ( | 3 comments)
Jamie Davies on the apocalyptic Paul: from interpretation to theology
Jamie Davies makes J. ( | 2 comments)
Jamie Davies on the apocalyptic Paul: the J. Louis Martyn school
In the second chapter of The Apocalyptic Paul: Retrospect and Prospect, Jamie Davies introduces what is effectively a “school” of modern interpreters who have built on J. Louis Martyn’s account of Paul’s apocalyptic thought: Martinus de Boer, Leander Keck, Alexandra Brown, Beverly Gaventa… ( | 1 comment)
Jamie Davies on the apocalyptic Paul: from Weiss to Martyn
Jamie Davies’ book The Apocalyptic Paul: Retrospect and Prospect comes in two parts: a look back down the long road that has led to attempts to assimilate the “apocalyptic Paul” into systematic theologies, and a look forward to see where that road might take us next. I’m not sure how far I… ()
The narrative vocabulary of rape in the Old Testament and the counter-example of Amnon and Tamar
I asked in the previous post about blaming Bathsheba, “If it was a rape, why isn’t it presented as a rape?” James McGrath asks to the contrary, if we call Amnon’s assault of Tamar “rape,” why do we not apply the same category to David’s sexual encounter with Bathsheba? “Where in the story is… ( | 3 comments)
No one’s blaming Bathsheba
James McGrath made this comment in response to my treatment of Bathsheba’s bathing in my previous two posts (see the links below): I found myself unable to keep reading after you blamed Bathsheba for washing herself after the end of her menstruation as the Law mandates, in a place that… ( | 3 comments)