Recent comments
JT replied to Andrew
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
AndrewDo you believe this?CA is committed to the doctrines which are commonly considered as the...
(Mon, 13/05/2013 - 19:06)
Ed Dingess replied to Andrew
on The battle between theology and history for the soul of the church: 24 antitheses:
For this reason therefore the Jews were seeking all the more to kill Him, because He not only was...
(Mon, 13/05/2013 - 13:20)
Ed Dingess replied to Andrew
on The battle between theology and history for the soul of the church: 24 antitheses:
Hi Andrew,I am curious about your opinion of the murder of Jesus. Why did the Jews kill Jesus...
(Sun, 12/05/2013 - 23:26)
Ed Dingess replied to Andrew
on The battle between theology and history for the soul of the church: 24 antitheses:
Thanks for responding Andrew.I briefly addressed this question here. On the whole, the grammatical-...
(Sun, 12/05/2013 - 16:10)
Andrew replied to Ed Dingess
on The battle between theology and history for the soul of the church: 24 antitheses:
Thanks for the feedback, Ed.In what way does your method do justice to the text, while other...
(Sun, 12/05/2013 - 12:39)
Ed Dingess
on The battle between theology and history for the soul of the church: 24 antitheses:
I tend to think of it broadly as a clash between theology and history, but, as the chart below...
(Sat, 11/05/2013 - 22:46)
Jaco van Zyl replied to Ed Dingess
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
Same goes for you, thanks, Ed. And our little exchange shall testify on our behalf. ;-)
(Sat, 11/05/2013 - 18:52)
Ed Dingess replied to Jaco van Zyl
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
Jaco,You are attempting to establish a false disjunction. Sola Scriptura is the tradition we follow...
(Sat, 11/05/2013 - 17:36)
Jaco van Zyl replied to Ed Dingess
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
Prima traditione vs Sola scriptura.
I have no other choice than to follow the example of the...
(Sat, 11/05/2013 - 17:12)
Ed Dingess replied to Jaco van Zyl
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
I am pleased to stand in the tradition of men like Calvin, Luther, Augustine, and yes, Paul. It...
(Sat, 11/05/2013 - 15:29)
Ed Dingess replied to Jaco van Zyl
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
I am pleased to stand in the tradition of men like Calvin, Luther, Augustine, and yes, Paul. It...
(Sat, 11/05/2013 - 15:27)
Jaco van Zyl replied to JT
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
O dear, we’re playing the righteousness card again.Sadly no amount of self-righteousness will undo...
(Sat, 11/05/2013 - 14:46)
JT replied to Jaco van Zyl
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
JacoJust a few non trinitarian comments for you.I come from a background where i have dealt with...
(Sat, 11/05/2013 - 11:12)
Andrew replied to Jaco van Zyl
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
On that note, how about putting this conversation to bed, friends? Good night.
(Sat, 11/05/2013 - 01:11)
cherylu replied to Jaco van Zyl
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
Thanks, I had been wondering.
(Sat, 11/05/2013 - 00:02)
Jaco van Zyl replied to cherylu
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
Hey Cheryl, that’s a different Jaco van Zyl…
(Fri, 10/05/2013 - 23:19)
Jaco van Zyl replied to JT
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
If some of your heroes deny certain central tenets of your orthodoxy, that’s a problem you folks...
(Fri, 10/05/2013 - 23:17)
BradK replied to Rich
on Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament:
Rich, has Andrew stated somewhere a belief that Adam was the first human or that the flood was a...
(Fri, 10/05/2013 - 22:04)
Rich replied to Andrew
on Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament:
Apart from the Noachic covenant there is no covenant with humanity. They are all covenants with the...
(Fri, 10/05/2013 - 21:54)
cherylu replied to Jaco
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
Jaco,This is a tangent, but I am wondering if you are the Jaco van Zyl that is the South African...
(Fri, 10/05/2013 - 21:26)
JT replied to Jaco
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
ah Jaco….. it is you that emphasised the ‘revivication’….. so I mentioned I cant see it anywhere (...
(Fri, 10/05/2013 - 20:35)
Jaco replied to JT
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
I don’t think you know exactly what is your point. You’re back-paddling on nearly every fallacy I’...
(Fri, 10/05/2013 - 16:39)
Jaco replied to JT
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
John TancockMaybe you’d want to represent my case more accurately. Strawmen only serve the...
(Fri, 10/05/2013 - 16:34)
JT replied to Jaco
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
I agree of course but that wasnt my point. YOU then shouldn’t claim that there is some new kind of...
(Fri, 10/05/2013 - 16:03)
JT replied to Jaco
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
I agree of course but that wasnt my point. YOU then shouldn’t claim that there is some new kind of...
(Fri, 10/05/2013 - 16:03)
JT replied to Jaco
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
JacoLike I said you are all wrong and this time the size of ‘your’ movement is relevant. I dnt...
(Fri, 10/05/2013 - 15:54)
Jaco replied to JT
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
Truth is truth even if nobody believes it; and falsehood is falsehood even if everyone believes it…
(Fri, 10/05/2013 - 15:30)
Jaco replied to JT
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
Truth is truth even if nobody believes it; and falsehood is falsehood even if everyone believes it…
(Fri, 10/05/2013 - 15:30)
Andrew replied to peter wilkinson
on Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament:
…what seems to emerge from these covenants is something of an overarching purpose, which might be...
(Fri, 10/05/2013 - 15:12)
Jaco replied to JT
on Jesus as Lord in Mark:
Hi JTI think you make a fundamantal mistake Jaco, the concerns that I and others have and the...
(Fri, 10/05/2013 - 15:00)
- ‹ previous
- 8 of 131
- next ›





